Are you stupid or something? Read your link.
Healthcare providers are required by law to report to VAERS:
Natural immunity is great but you actually have to contract COVID 19 in order to get it. It would be much better for those who contract the virus to be vaccinated. Particularly, those at higher risk. I'm not sure why that even needs to be said.Comparing SARS-CoV-2 natural immunity to vaccine-induced immunity: reinfections versus breakthrough infections
Background Reports of waning vaccine-induced immunity against COVID-19 have begun to surface. With that, the comparable long-term protection conferred by previous infection with SARS-CoV-2 remains unclear. Methods We conducted a retrospective observational study comparing three groups...www.medrxiv.org
If @SH0RTS keeps this up I’m going to have to lube up with Neosporin. I pop out of quarantine tomorrow, so keep my wife in your prayers. She finna get turnt!
Oh this is getting good. @TBFan has been put on fvcking NOTICE
There is no binary choice. I chose not to get vaccinated. I eventually got the Delta variant and recovered. I now have natural immunity and do not believe I need the vaccine based on the evidence shown in multiple studies. In fact, getting the vaccine AFTER obtaining natural immunity seems to be a great risk. There are those who disagree saying getting the vaccine after obtaining natural immunity boosts the immunity. Who is right since we have conflicting studies? That is the question.Natural immunity and vaccines aren’t a choice. Getting Covid with no protection or getting vaccinated is the choice. One is waaaaaay more dangerous than the other.
Natural immunity is great but you actually have to contract COVID 19 in order to get it. It would be much better for those who contract the virus to be vaccinated. Particularly, those at higher risk. I'm not sure why that even needs to be said.
That was a great summation. Thanks.I got up early and listened to the podcast.
Dr Malone said he invented the mRNA technology that was used in making the vaccines.
He also said that people having natural immunity and get the vaccine are 2 to 4 times more likely to have adverse effects from the vaccine.
He stated he was the one that discovered that famotidine improved survivability in COVID through computer modeling. A huge portion of his time was spent on the repurposing of medications because of ADE potential. He discussed HCQ and Ivermectin.
He talks about the Trusted News Initiative, misinformation, and censorship. He talked about the politicization of Medical Boards.
He talks about the variables that may be causing the Palestinians to have a higher survival rate than the Israelis when the Israelis have very high vaccination rates and the Palestinians have low vaccination rates.
He discusses VAERS briefly. Said he was a pathologist.
He stated that Pfizer manipulated data in their original study on children and Pfizer stated a subject had gastric distress when she actually had seizures and they removed her from the study. He said a whistleblower from Pfizer was the one that gave the details.
He stated got rampant hypertension from his second vaccination and almost died from it.
He said he's headed over a billion dollars of grants on vaccine research.
He stated he was the one who received the initial protocol from the Chinese on what they used to treat once the pandemic hit. It included HCQ and he gave it to our government in Feb after the virus hit.
He stated that the protocol packet used in India to completely flatline COVID was kept secret.
He stated he thinks he is the only person involved in the development of mRNA technology that does not have a financial interest in it.
He talks about myocarditis occurring more frequently than reported. Dysmenorrhea is also very high.
He talked about the synthetic lipid used in the vaccine and its higher distribution in the ovaries. Said the Hasidic Jews saw issues in mensuration among their population.
He stated a hypothesis on the myocarditis increase is a microcoagulation caused from the spike protein binding ACE2 on capillaries and a peristalsis effect causing blood pooling. Could be autoimmune as well.
He described the spike protein as a treble hook on the end of a stalk. He stated that pharma did not show that their spike protein is not toxic. Said the real question is how toxic is it and how frequently it is toxic. He said long COVID and post vaccination syndrome are the same.
He said people with high glycemic indexes are more susceptible to adverse effects from COVID and the vaccine.
He said something is causing the release of T cell suppression and the reactivation of DNA viruses in mRNA vaccinated people. He said the more mRNA vaccinations we get, the more problem this could be.
He stated there is data from Denmark that showed negative efficacy in vaccination against Omicron. He said it could be because of risky behavior from vaccinated people. Said the FDA knows about it but has not said anything or changed policy.
He said that the decreased longevity of the vaccines could be due to antigenic sin. Basically priming the body for a virus that no longer exists because of virus mutation.
Said Omicron is infecting upper airways where Delta was more in the lungs. It means it's less pathogenic and low mortality.
Said Omicron had a R0 value similar to measles. Said we're all going to get it.
Talks briefly on mass formation psychosis.
He doesn't sound anti-vax, he sounds antigovernment when it comes to this situation. He gives his reasons why he feels that way. He has a compelling argument.
😂For those interested, here is Dr. Malone's substack on Mass Formation Psychosis.
Psychosis is posting regurgitated articles from Facebook to argue with a physician handling COVID on a daily basis, and despite that physician debunking everything you post, you are STILL dug in to your side.For those interested, here is Dr. Malone's substack on Mass Formation Psychosis.
The Dr. and I have not argued over anything as of yet. But that aside, a dr. treating patients for COVID has little to do with the data being published in studies that I and others have posted refuting some of the narrative coming from the CDC. Ignoring data to continue to believe what one chooses to believe from their supposed "leaders" is the definition of Mass Formation Psychosis.Psychosis is posting regurgitated articles from Facebook to argue with a physician handling COVID on a daily basis, and despite that physician debunking everything you post, you are STILL dug in to your side.
Thank you for proving my post accurate 😂The Dr. and I have not argued over anything as of yet. But that aside, a dr. treating patients for COVID has little to do with the data being published in studies that I and others have posted refuting some of the narrative coming from the CDC. Ignoring data to continue to believe what one chooses to believe from their supposed "leaders" is the definition of Mass Formation Psychosis.
The Dr. and I have not argued over anything as of yet. But that aside, a dr. treating patients for COVID has little to do with the data being published in studies that I and others have posted refuting some of the narrative coming from the CDC. Ignoring data to continue to believe what one chooses to believe from their supposed "leaders" is the definition of Mass Formation Psychosis.
Oh you certainly are. You’re also psychotic to believe your “research” is more reliable than a practicing physician.Lame.
He has not.He asked you to post a peer reviewed study. Have you done that?
Yes. I posted the links, as well as many over on the COVID Board.He asked you to post a peer reviewed study. Have you done that?
Physicians tend to care for patients based on what they are told to do. But the fact that you discount research proves Dr. Malone's point. Any data that contradicts the mainstream narrative is attacked.Oh you certainly are. You’re also psychotic to believe your “research” is more reliable than a practicing physician.
Yes I did. But as usual, people like you just discount it since it doesn't jive with your beliefs.He has not.
One must be careful when citing practicing physicians as a source. In my area, we had physicians that were treating COVID with nothing. Other physicians were at wit's end and used anything they thought might help. That included HCQ and Ivermectin. The ones using Ivermectin must have thought it did well because they kept prescribing it. There was a huge disparity in how it was treated.Oh you certainly are. You’re also psychotic to believe your “research” is more reliable than a practicing physician.
Yes. I posted the links, as well as many over on the COVID Board.
Stumpid likes nothing more than adding to his postcount with covid shite on the bunk. He rarely discusses this on the appropriate board, so…..Yes. I posted the links, as well as many over on the COVID Board.
Stumpid likes nothing more than adding to his postcount with covid shite on the bunk. He rarely discusses this on the appropriate board, so…..
Exactly. Some doctors were willing to read the data showing ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine are good therapeutics while others would only prescribe Z pack and other minor relief.One must be careful when citing practicing physicians as a source. In my area, we had physicians that were treating COVID with nothing. Other physicians were at wit's end and used anything they thought might help. That included HCQ and Ivermectin. The ones using Ivermectin must have thought it did well because they kept prescribing it. There was a huge disparity in how it was treated.