He got vaccines in December 2020? How?
Stop with the ADE. Also, nobody believes you he was passed out due to Covid on his apt floor for 2 days. Lol
Whenever you have a little time to kill
- Thread starter Justin Time
- Start date
He got vaccines in December 2020? How?
Stop with the ADE. Also, nobody believes you he was passed out due to Covid on his apt floor for 2 days. Lol
The use of the term “straw man” is overdone and hilariously a way to distract from the the accusations and proof that you are a conspiracy theorist. Yet another example you’ve proven to be a hypocrite. You still have not addressed the your delta surge comment, and I doubt you ever will.
Dr Malone couldn't have made his point any better about 'mass formation psychosis' than just looking at how these drones react to any differing opinions than what Fauci/CDC/Pfizer, etc tells them.
It matters that you're vaccinated while actively doing everything you can around here to get posters to risk illness and maybe even worse by deliberately spreading manure.
It matters because you're a deadbeat POS that doesn't practice what he preaches.
Except I’ve explained it to you and you just add more bullshit like “you’re missing the obvious point” with a bunch of childish hashtags and silly parenthetical disclaimers. Have a good one bruh.
Considering I’m not a fan of fauci or cdc, you’re way off base. Did you get this response out of the patriot talking point handbook?
Imagine being as pathetically stupid as @AUB03 ... That's impressive kell
We all just missed the point. That’s his only defense. Then some hashtags, italics, and parenthetical disclaimers to make sure he doesn’t post anything shorter than yore average thesis. I also love the “just post 3 or 4 dumb posts I’ve made” argument when the 1 up for discussion, where he states delta was planned, is impossible to defend. Lolz
Bro you're just so massively full of shit it hurts. Or maybe you're just stupid.
Either way, lol
We are encouraged to report any suspected reactions/complications to our administration
You're required to submit a VAERS report if it pertains to specific instances, occurring within a specific time, and you are encouraged to submit a VAERS report if those standards do not apply.
- Is that correct?
He's truly a gullible (and simple) man... Even though he thinks himself intellectually superior.
Poor liferz
We are not “required” to report to VAERS individually however our administration reports these events. Most events are reported multiple times as that it is usually reported by patient and/or family, hospital systems, providers, friends, etc.
For instance, the case of the myositis that I discussed ITT was reported over 20 times (mostly by friends and family).
... because others have said it was a requirement, but it actually isn't. Your admin does it voluntarily (passive system etc) , but not all events are reported, and not all events are investigated- as others have alluded to.
And, it's quite possible that not all healthcare facilities report as stringently as your does. Is that fair?
We have a doctor IN THIS THREAD giving us first-hand information on why the vaccines are extremely safe and effective. That upsets you and your fellow loons, so you desperately try to pretend its not happening. No one is asking you imbeciles to take anyone's word for it aside than the eminently qualified doctor who is a member of this site and a well known reliable source of information.
he also said you and Stump were wrong in your VAERS summation. Did you notice that?
Dan, if an equally eminent, qualified doctor said differently, but posted on the Ole Miss board instead, are they a maroon?
Your son got both of his COVID shots prior to January 2021? That sounds extremely dubious. Was her part of a clinical trial? Is he a high ranking government official?
Whatever happened to your son almost certainly has nothing to do with the vaccine, but you have been pushing these nutty anti-vaxxer lies for so long, you are desperate to try and make a connection.
Last edited:
Dr Malone has more knowledge on the vaccine than anyone on das boonker.
Last edited:
Nope. He's a nutty quack on a mission to get more people killed by undermining confidence in the vaccines safety and effectiveness. The only reason you worship him is because he says things you want to hear. Meanwhile, we have a real doctor on the board who has a track record of credibility and he agrees with the 99% of doctors who aren't anti-vaxxer quacks.
it's funny 'cause they don't want to credit Malone with anything, but apparently he was researching mrna while he was still a student.
I've asked you about 20 times to link just 4 or 5 posts that show me doing ANYTHING to get others to risk illness or where I've asked anyone to not take the new vaccines. You have never linked even a single post. That says it all.
Me providing information that the leading agencies lie about, suppress and cancel other experts for saying, (to allow for objectivity so that people can make fair, balanced and informed decisions), is NOT the same as me telling folks they should engage in risky behavior. I'm actually trying to position people to assess their risk/reward ratio correctly/accurately, while the agenda is trying to deceive, manipulate and bully folks into getting the new mRNA vaccines by hook or crook, (spinning, baking, lying, using propaganda misinformation etc.).
Are you implying that you feel it's typical that VAERS incidents are over-reported, (i.e. saying that a case you know about was reported over 20 times)???
- Do you feel some doctors who feel that the new vaccines are providing overall benefit/good, might under report incidents?
- Do you feel that overall that associated incidents are over-reported, or under-reported, (i.e. in your opinion).
You peddle BS and deal almost exclusively in pure manipulation. While we appreciate a single doctor's opinion, you fail to be consistent in your assessments. Please answer EACH question
- Does his being a doctor make his opinions automatic fact, or are they still anecdotal, (which is your favorite way to dismiss opinions that you don't agree with). While appreciated, qualified and valuable, are his opinions still anecdotal?
- I may have missed it, but where specifically in this thread has Doc given us specific information as to why the new vaccines are "extremely safe and effective".
- The new mRNA vaccines are effective in reducing severe hospitalizations and death, but that's not what we were promised initially.
- They have failed to come close to providing sterilizing immunity, herd immunity, keeping us from contracting COVID, maintaining significant viral load allowing the virus to mutate in fully vaccinated folks, and spreading COVID to others
- We have yet to determine whether they represent a Pyrrhic victory where we are evoking a strong narrow, local and specific immunological response, at the expense of better overall, general protection against the entire family of variants etc.
- I understand that given your ability to analyze, you really are TRYING to do a good thing using a "by any means necessary" approach to blindly promote the vaccines, but history may NOT look kindly on the final results regarding the management of this pandemic using mass psychosis, delusion, deception, lying, bullying and Orwellian censorship
- The new mRNA vaccines are effective in reducing severe hospitalizations and death, but that's not what we were promised initially.
- Why is it that when other "eminently qualified doctors" provide dissenting opinions that go against the established narrative, do you not take the same tact, and promote their every opinion as FACT?
Last edited:
So, in your mind and opinion, Dr. Robert Malone, (and really, any other scientist, researcher or doctor who's spent their lives as actual virologists and experts in the field), is/are less qualified to opine, than regular doctors, (in general)?
When it comes to discussing and understanding the inner machinations and mechanisms associated with the new mRNA vaccines, what percentage of average practitioners do you feel, are likely to have more knowledge and be more qualified than experts in the field such as Dr. Malone? Is he a "nutty quack", simply because he has a qualified opinion that's different from yours, or that he has a few reasonable concerns about the vaccines?
When you do real science, should you take honest, objective and COMPLETE looks at all aspects of a new drug, or just glad hand it and use delusion to IMAGINE that it's unicorn'ish, and has rainbows sprouting out of it's behind? When you short-circuit an analysis and fail to do real science, is it more or less likely that you could end up taking one step forward in the short term, but two or three backwards in the bigger picture scenario, (i.e. a pyrrhic victory)? We should be grateful that all doctors, scientists and researchers aren't willing to just dismiss concerns and rush along to join the mainstream narrative so as to avoid castigation and cancelling.
I've had multiple doctors from around the country tell me some version of "Well, if we tried to vet everything, and waited for things to be perfect, we'd never get anywhere, and we'd lose lives in the SHORT TERM". I think that we dang well ought to have some bright and objective minds working on the long term scenario to make sure that what we're doing is ultimately a win for mankind, as opposed to a long term and overall LOSS.
The left is positioning themselves as the party of big pharma, govt control, and pro excess corporate profits and expressly anti blue collar worker at a time with record recent graduate unemployment, record low levels of wealth in recent graduates and a dramatic decrease in young adults deciding to go to college.
Democrats just keep hitching their wagons to the trillionare pharma and corporate ceos and telling people they aren’t allowed to question their over lords….and we get to see what happens next.
Welcome to the next realignment folks!
Democrats just keep hitching their wagons to the trillionare pharma and corporate ceos and telling people they aren’t allowed to question their over lords….and we get to see what happens next.
Welcome to the next realignment folks!
The VAERS Database now has over 1M COVID Vaccine injuries reported and 20,000 deaths. A Columbia University study estimates the deaths are actually 400,000.
"Comparing our estimate with the CDC-reported VFR (0.002%) suggests VAERS deaths are underreported by a factor of 20, consistent with known VAERS under-ascertainment bias."
www.researchgate.net
But everyone knows Columbia is filled with right wing quacks, so...
"Comparing our estimate with the CDC-reported VFR (0.002%) suggests VAERS deaths are underreported by a factor of 20, consistent with known VAERS under-ascertainment bias."
(PDF) COVID vaccination and age-stratified all-cause mortality risk
PDF | Accurate estimates of COVID vaccine-induced severe adverse event and death rates are critical for risk-benefit ratio analyses of vaccination and... | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ResearchGate
www.researchgate.net
But everyone knows Columbia is filled with right wing quacks, so...
Imagine living in a world where taking a fvcking vaccine that has proven to be safe and effective in fighting a pandemic puts you in the pocket of big pharma.
That would still be preferable to hitching said wagon to a gang of carnival barkers and the rubes that worship them.
You're not "providing information" you're spreading harmful manure as a troll who wants to see people suffer. It's as simple as that.
Besides, pretty much everyone has taken a position on the vaccine at this point... yet yore personal jihad continues.
You could have just said “you’re exactly right” and saved yourself some time. Thanks though.
Why does it sound dubious? Vaccinations on a mass scale began in December of 2020. His first shot was in early 2021 and he got the second one shortly thereafter. He works for a subsidiary of Delta in Atlanta and was required to get it. As for that other jerk who said that my story of him passing out on the floor for 2 days did not happen, well, he is an ass. It did happen and could have easily died.
