We are now hearing reports that the COVID vaccines can actually weaken your immune system, and make one more susceptible to future infection. This is one of the claims Dr. Malone has made. Many on hear would say that that is just nutty, conspiracy, right-wing talking points, although I have no idea how discussing the efficacy of covid vaccines is right or left wing.
So do you want actually data?
Dr, Malone has pointed out that he is not just making this data up. He has pulled this from a variety of reputable sources, one of them the NIH: National Library of Medicine (
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33113270/).
I quote:
"The aim of the study was to determine if sufficient literature exists to require clinicians to disclose the specific risk that COVID-19 vaccines could worsen disease upon exposure to challenge or circulating virus."
Results of the study:
"COVID-19 vaccines designed to elicit neutralising antibodies may sensitise vaccine recipients to more severe disease than if they were not vaccinated. Vaccines for SARS, MERS and RSV have never been approved, and the data generated in the development and testing of these vaccines suggest a serious mechanistic concern: that vaccines designed empirically using the traditional approach (consisting of the unmodified or minimally modified coronavirus viral spike to elicit neutralising antibodies), be they composed of protein, viral vector, DNA or RNA and irrespective of delivery method, may worsen COVID-19 disease via antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). This risk is sufficiently obscured in clinical trial protocols and consent forms for ongoing COVID-19 vaccine trials that adequate patient comprehension of this risk is unlikely to occur, obviating truly informed consent by subjects in these trials."
Conclusions drawn from the study and clinical implications:
The specific and significant COVID-19 risk of ADE should have been and should be prominently and independently disclosed to research subjects currently in vaccine trials, as well as those being recruited for the trials and future patients after vaccine approval, in order to meet the medical ethics standard of patient comprehension for informed consent.
There are many such studies which are widely available, but don't seem to get the press that Fauci gets.
Bringing up these concerns should not be attacked, ridiculed, and dismissed. They should be discussed openly and with full transparency. It is the fact that they aren't which is of the greatest concern to many of us.