Are you in essence saying that the new vaccines don't work as well as they were reported to work, therefore, we need everyone possible to take them to have hopes of limiting COVID???
I know for the longest, you've been saying that they were "modern day miracles" that were SUPER effective and pretty much flawless. A few of us warned you about making such silly guarantees, even though you were just parroting the experts who were saying that they would in essence provide sterilizing immunity. You, DM8 and many others said that you would "stick with the experts over your dumb A opinions", but then, when that was proven to NOT be true, (against all odds, due to the collusion and resulting narrative), by honest scientists doing real science in other countries, you copied the "Oh, they were only meant to address severe illness and deaths" goalpost shift.
Since then, you have been consistently saying, "they work GREAT for reducing severe illnesses and deaths and they were true miracles". But with your statement above, I'm a tad bit confused. If the new vaccines come anywhere remotely close to the numbers that you've posted since January, even restricting the benefit to severe illness and death, then we should be good even if everyone doesn't take them, correct??? And of course, I'm not saying that anyone shouldn't take them, but just clarifying your position on the efficacy, since you've been wrong so much, throughout the pandemic.