You don’t need police to stop that. You want your own city-state? You better get your own water treatment, power generation, telecom and natural gas contracts together. Also, that garbage is going to start collecting real fast.
That’s how you know they’re anti-fascist.Why do they need guns and walls in this utopia?
Why do they need guns and walls in this utopia?
Because you didn’t look or suck at google.Why can’t I find this anywhere else?
I'll go with he didn't even try to look it up.
Oh I’m sorry, I forgot to check rt.com. Silly me
Pull out, blockade, get residence out and cut the power.Why can’t I find this anywhere else?
Let them have the city. That is what they want.Pull out, blockade, get residence out and cut the power.
Would be pretty easy to convince them that autonomy doesn’t mean what they think it meansYou don’t need police to stop that. You want your own city-state? You better get your own water treatment, power generation, telecom and natural gas contracts together. Also, that garbage is going to start collecting real fast.
What they're really talking about is budget cuts and community programs I was told
so they are barricading themselves in and saying this is no longer the US. Seems like a very easy target for the "US" to take back what is theirs.
Bro, there is a helluva lot that the national media doesn’t put on the air. Maybe turn to something besides your usual news channel.My bad bro. I assumed “armed paramilitaries seizing control and imposing their anti-democratic agenda” might make national headlines. Guess the OP was just a little bit sensationalist. Next time I’ll check the highly regarded rt.com first.
Maybe you missed the point. There was no armed paramilitary seizing control, as the OP suggested. And yes, something of that magnitude would be on every national headline. Funny enough, your post just further proves that ANTIFA is a boogeyman.Bro, there is a helluva lot that the national media doesn’t put on the air. Maybe turn to something besides your usual news channel.
wut?? I thought they took over the city a long time ago...
An air strike on a domestic, high density, civilian population. You’re unhinged.
That is an interesting question. Why do you think that is?Why can’t I find this anywhere else?
Never a good look bringing up the civil warlol. You were cheering the riots and deaths of innocent people during those so Don’t go all hypocritical on us now... wait, forgot who I was talking to. And they’ve declared their independence, it’s now a foreign nation. I bet you supported no military strikes on the south for the very same reasons, amirite???. Tell us all how Lincoln was a damn terrorist and murderer now...
My bad bro. I assumed “armed paramilitaries seizing control and imposing their anti-democratic agenda” might make national headlines. Guess the OP was just a little bit sensationalist. Next time I’ll check the highly regarded rt.com first.
Interesting.Because an armed paramilitary did not actually seize control of an area of Seattle as this thread claimed.
He's not unstable. He's just the biggest racist on the Bunker. Bar none.I hope you have just missed your meds recently because no one is "intentionally" this big of a tool without being mentally unstable.
Madonna mia! You telling me there's a "fvcking god"??? Do they have actual live pRon at the services?!?!?!? I need to see this!Oh my fvcking god
No you don’t but you may be illiterate
Got it. So there were weapons involved and there is an area that is now controlled by an independent, loosely organized group other than city authorities but they aren’t (IYO) “paramilitary” so, instead of focusing on what’s actually happening (that you disagree with) you choose to focus on rhetoric? Serious question, If the armed men in the tweet were right wing fanatics, would you be up in arms over the labeling of “paramilitary”?Nope. But it’s not actually an autonomous zone. Maybe some people have guns. But there was no armed and organized overtaking of part of Seattle by a paramilitary group.
My internet searches for Antifa taking over Seattle yielded nothing from the Seattle Times or any national news outlets, one opinion piece from a blog level northwest publication, and a bunch of articles about false SM fueled rumors about Antifa doing and planning various
I'm down with them handling it in the same manner they handled the Cliven Bundy group that took over land in protest. The government murdered folks there. I guess they should do that here.So you are in support of an airstrike on a domestic, high density, civilian population? That's doing the right thing? Just so you are aware, there was no actual armed paramilitary group that seized control of part of Seattle.
...and you promptly illustrate my previous point beautifully. Very well done.The entire premise of the thread was highly sensationalized. I disagreed with it. I'm sorry you're so scared of the ANTIFA boogeyman.
Ok, whatever makes you feel better.Nah. Classic rthomas non-response.