I totally agree on not discrediting data, but this article was written my an attorney, not a medical expert. Additionally, he’s applying a factor to the data to assume side effects more broadly which is a major reach by someone, who once again, isn’t a medical expert or even a statistician."Not Necessarily"..... I don't think that means what you think it means. Abnormal deaths are increasing - non-covid related. Cancers are increasing, I've got a neighbor with an extremely rare brain fungus... there's only been about 30 cases known in history. 17 of them currently 'under review' by the NIH. How about the great increase in suicides? Does that count for anything?
All I'm saying is that information is coming out about the vax and it's not great. We'll find out more as time passes, but people have a right to be informed with what we know now. They have a right to informed consent, not a re-hashing of the discredited propaganda.
I’m willing to believe that the vax can cause the issues mentioned above, but not until a medical expert/scientist can substantiate the claims.