A quack, sorry, I meant quick update on Dr McCullough. He's now advocating medicine that has 0 medical oversight or trials of any kind, and he's pushing them alongside Alex Jones. Medicine without any trials is bad right? Or is it good now?
LOL!!! So, you want to have an intelligent discussion, but you can't take the time to read 2 or 3 relatively short paragraphs??? Or, did you read it, and felt that your arguments were thoroughly refuted, but you don't have enough integrity to simply say that you were wrong. Your reaction is quite telling, (and you're laughing...)? This is exactly why you and the other few aren't taken seriously, and have lost all respect on serious topics.
There's no hope of learning or growing if you take this awful approach. We're all wrong at times, and we can all learn from one another, but only if we are mature, humble and honest with ourselves and each other.
Fact Check:
- I've never said that "medicine needs years of trials
- I don't use McCollough "as evidence"