at arguing their case on social issues? Is it because they don't take a principled position and are simply reactionary?
Take for example our more recent rediculious outrage, the transgender issue.
This was a solution in search of a problem. The NC law is the opposite of a fee market solution. It should be up to place of business where someone goes to the restroom. If you don't feel safe there you don't shop there.
At the very least the republicans should have let the left fire the first shot. Because now the left gets to take the position of the defenders of the oppressed instead of simply advocates of less than .03% of the population.
And finally stop attacking the minority and instead attack the massive loophole it creates. How hard is it simply say "we aren't opposed to transgender people, we are opposed to the massive loophole it creates. Obamas newest executive order give pubescent boys the right to hang out in the girls locker room." The transgender girl may now feel safe in the girls locker room but the rest of the girls feel unsafe because there are a half dozen pervs claiming to be a girl so they can get a look and some seniors boobs and don't even try to suggest that a 15 year old boy and his friends wouldn't give it a shot.
And now we are stuck talking about this dumbass non problem instead of talking about the economy, foreign policy, the stupid lies Clinton is telling about the "wage gap", and any number of real problems.
Take for example our more recent rediculious outrage, the transgender issue.
This was a solution in search of a problem. The NC law is the opposite of a fee market solution. It should be up to place of business where someone goes to the restroom. If you don't feel safe there you don't shop there.
At the very least the republicans should have let the left fire the first shot. Because now the left gets to take the position of the defenders of the oppressed instead of simply advocates of less than .03% of the population.
And finally stop attacking the minority and instead attack the massive loophole it creates. How hard is it simply say "we aren't opposed to transgender people, we are opposed to the massive loophole it creates. Obamas newest executive order give pubescent boys the right to hang out in the girls locker room." The transgender girl may now feel safe in the girls locker room but the rest of the girls feel unsafe because there are a half dozen pervs claiming to be a girl so they can get a look and some seniors boobs and don't even try to suggest that a 15 year old boy and his friends wouldn't give it a shot.
And now we are stuck talking about this dumbass non problem instead of talking about the economy, foreign policy, the stupid lies Clinton is telling about the "wage gap", and any number of real problems.
