514,000 new shots given yesterday (first time shots). We were over 500,000 before fda approval. Oh well. I figured this would happen. I guess it will help with mandates at least. They just went to the next excuse on the list.
I've also seen that the vaccine the FDA approved is not the same Pfizer vaccine that has been given to the public over the last several months. It's another vaccine not yet available. So there's that.
Here's some info on it:
![]()
2 Things Mainstream Media Didn’t Tell You About FDA’s Approval of the Pfizer Vaccine - LewRockwell
Monday, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a biologics license application for the Pfizer Comirnaty vaccine. The press reported that vaccine mandates are now legal for military, healthcare workers, college students and employees in many industries. New York City Mayor Bill de...www.lewrockwell.com
And you anti-science people will do anything to promote the vaccines, even ignoring facts to do so.Holy shit. You dumb fvcks fall for anything and everything. That’s ok. Delta will vaccinate the people that aren’t getting vaccinated. That’s why I’m so happy natural immunity is pretty equal to vaccines in most studies.
And you anti-science people will do anything to promote the vaccines, even ignoring facts to do so.
By the way, natural immunity is far superior to vaccine immunity, according to the science.
I posted several studies on this a few days ago. The science is undeniable.No, no, it’s not. Multiple studies show different findings. The biggest thing for natural immunity is short-term protection vs infection over Pfizer (moderna beats Pfizer too). The biggest thing for vaccines is more wide range protection vs variants long term. I started a thread on this recently.
And the day you present me facts will be the first day.
I posted several studies on this a few days ago. The science is undeniable.
Yes it is.No, it’s actually not. When multiple studies show different things, it’s clearly not. Even the one I posted in favor of natural immunity had serious flaws to it but it definitely shows protection against infection is very similar.
Yes it is.
Yes it is.
You're insults are old and show how insignificant your arguments are. The science shows that natural immunity protects against variants, and does so in a far superior ability than vaccines, which have to be formulated to combat each strain of covid, much like flu vaccines every year. So no one believes your arguments anymore. But please keep posting. We want you to continue to embarrass yourself so more and more people will ignore you.
You're insults are old and show how insignificant your arguments are. The science shows that natural immunity protects against variants, and does so in a far superior ability than vaccines, which have to be formulated to combat each strain of covid, much like flu vaccines every year. So no one believes your arguments anymore. But please keep posting. We want you to continue to embarrass yourself so more and more people will ignore you.
That hasn't been proven at level you are stating it, (not yet), but for kicks and giggles, let's assume it's true. Then why the heck are they asking us to take boosters???Dude, I just showed you they don’t. Here’s another article talking about the sane thing from the U of Penn study. Educate yourself.
![]()
Antibodies Waning? The Immune System Has a Backup Plan For That
Antibodies against the coronavirus wane over time, but the immune system has a backup plan that doesn’t rely on boosters, according to a study by scientists at the University of Pennsylvania, where technology for mRNA vaccines was developed.www.bloomberg.com
That hasn't been proven at level you are stating it, (not yet), but for kicks and giggles, let's assume it's true. Then why the heck are they asking us to take boosters???
Either, they are basing it on "science", and they are correct, or your article is wrong. Why do you feel we are being asked to take boosters?