I hate it, don't like it, & I know that we had their ass in JH 2 weeks ago. As much as I don't like it, after looking @ all the committees reasons, they should be in.
Should the SEC Champion be in? Yes, based on the BCS & CFP history. (Sorry if these stats have already been posted) In 25 years of a head to head championship games, the SEC has won 15, 60% of those championship years. Collectively, the B10, B12, & P12 have won 5, 20%. The ACC has won 5, 20%. 6 schools in the SEC have won championships, only 7 in the other 4 power 5 conferences combined.
Records say the SEC is the dominate conference & a joke to leave it's champion out.
The committee also made the correct choice based on their 5 criteria.
The sad thing is that next year or sometime is the future, we'll be hurting for the 13th ranked team. No system is perfect.
Should the SEC Champion be in? Yes, based on the BCS & CFP history. (Sorry if these stats have already been posted) In 25 years of a head to head championship games, the SEC has won 15, 60% of those championship years. Collectively, the B10, B12, & P12 have won 5, 20%. The ACC has won 5, 20%. 6 schools in the SEC have won championships, only 7 in the other 4 power 5 conferences combined.
Records say the SEC is the dominate conference & a joke to leave it's champion out.
The committee also made the correct choice based on their 5 criteria.
- #5--"Other relevant factors, such as unavailability of key players and coaches that may have affected a team’s performance during the season or will likely affect its postseason performance"
The sad thing is that next year or sometime is the future, we'll be hurting for the 13th ranked team. No system is perfect.