And jiggers the numbers likely muting the effects.
Study shows: “…more bad news doubles, triples, quads when they get it there is a consistently higher risk of long-hauler (long covid) syndrome as compared to pure unjected. Accumulation of Spike protein probably accounts for these findings. Giant mistake to load up with Spike every 6 months.”
www.nature.com
The real beauty is :
“to be "unvaccinated" only requires no vaccination within 30 days of positive test.
An unknown number would have been vaccinated after 30 days, before the end of the 6 month follow-up period, yet are included in this group!”
If you remember the health institute declaration that vaccinating aren’t effective for 14 to 21 days after injection, this means, that the effective life of the vax, according to the study, it’s only one or two weeks.
Engler also states: “I cannot find anywhere in the paper where the numbers relating to this are reported (yet they must have the data).
This seems a particularly egregious oversight given that the data suggests that adverse events from vacc'n are more severe in those known to have had Covid.”
interesting. Another example of manipulating the data or concealing it. Is almost commonplace now.
thread here:
Study shows: “…more bad news doubles, triples, quads when they get it there is a consistently higher risk of long-hauler (long covid) syndrome as compared to pure unjected. Accumulation of Spike protein probably accounts for these findings. Giant mistake to load up with Spike every 6 months.”
Long COVID after breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection - Nature Medicine
A new analysis using the US Department of Veterans Affairs national healthcare databases demonstrates that Long COVID can occur after breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection; however, the risk of death attributable to COVID and incidence of post-acute sequelae were substantially reduced (but not fully...
www.nature.com
The real beauty is :
“to be "unvaccinated" only requires no vaccination within 30 days of positive test.
An unknown number would have been vaccinated after 30 days, before the end of the 6 month follow-up period, yet are included in this group!”
If you remember the health institute declaration that vaccinating aren’t effective for 14 to 21 days after injection, this means, that the effective life of the vax, according to the study, it’s only one or two weeks.
Engler also states: “I cannot find anywhere in the paper where the numbers relating to this are reported (yet they must have the data).
This seems a particularly egregious oversight given that the data suggests that adverse events from vacc'n are more severe in those known to have had Covid.”
interesting. Another example of manipulating the data or concealing it. Is almost commonplace now.
thread here:
