Is not that we won the SECT and didn’t move up, I actually understand not letting a 1 wknd tourney weigh too much in the seeding.
The strangest part to me is that they created the NET so that they had metrics and rankings to go off of. This is a system that THEY created using criteria THEY thought were important….and then just completely ignore it. Why have it??
AU #5 in NET- 15 overall seed
Indiana St #28 in NET- left out of tourney
New Mexico is # 22 in NET, Duquesne #80 in NET…both 11 seeds.
Again, these are their rankings using their metrics they thought were important. They literally created these rankings….and then they just don’t use them.
The strangest part to me is that they created the NET so that they had metrics and rankings to go off of. This is a system that THEY created using criteria THEY thought were important….and then just completely ignore it. Why have it??
AU #5 in NET- 15 overall seed
Indiana St #28 in NET- left out of tourney
New Mexico is # 22 in NET, Duquesne #80 in NET…both 11 seeds.
Again, these are their rankings using their metrics they thought were important. They literally created these rankings….and then they just don’t use them.
