right? Anyway, Tucker did a story on it.
It's set to be ratified in a few days. It sorta gives the W.H.O. power and control over the US in a declared pandemic. I say sorta because the 2nd link below says it won't happen.
- and stuff. It's not only fascinating that it's occurring, it's fascinating that virtually no one knows about it.
Tedros. Close friend of Fauci. Once hired Robert Mugabe as a health ambassador.
"...national and global coordinated actions to address disinformation ... deploy counter-measures against social misinformation.... standards for digital vaccine passports..."
Tedros: I know lock-downs are hard, but the world can't go back, welcome the new normal.
On May 22, the World Health Assembly will take place in Geneva, where World Health Organization member states will meet to discuss current and future priorities for public health issues of global importance. On the agenda is a U.S.-proposed change to international health rules. These rules set the standards for all countries to have the ability to detect, assess, report and respond to public health events.
The proposed amendments outline new ideas to better respond to a pandemic. Across social media, users are referring to the amendments as the “pandemic treaty” and say it would grant the WHO “complete health sovereignty,” and unlimited authority over governments in a global health crisis.
---------- that's deceptive. "Complete" and "Unlimited" are the key words.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucel...ld-health-assembly-may-22-28/?sh=7eb26e8a2896
Now, I could be wrong, but the last time Tedros was involved, the US got fvcked. So who do I believe, Tucker or Tedros?
www.abc10.com
It's set to be ratified in a few days. It sorta gives the W.H.O. power and control over the US in a declared pandemic. I say sorta because the 2nd link below says it won't happen.
- and stuff. It's not only fascinating that it's occurring, it's fascinating that virtually no one knows about it.
Tedros. Close friend of Fauci. Once hired Robert Mugabe as a health ambassador.
"...national and global coordinated actions to address disinformation ... deploy counter-measures against social misinformation.... standards for digital vaccine passports..."
Tedros: I know lock-downs are hard, but the world can't go back, welcome the new normal.
On May 22, the World Health Assembly will take place in Geneva, where World Health Organization member states will meet to discuss current and future priorities for public health issues of global importance. On the agenda is a U.S.-proposed change to international health rules. These rules set the standards for all countries to have the ability to detect, assess, report and respond to public health events.
The proposed amendments outline new ideas to better respond to a pandemic. Across social media, users are referring to the amendments as the “pandemic treaty” and say it would grant the WHO “complete health sovereignty,” and unlimited authority over governments in a global health crisis.
---------- that's deceptive. "Complete" and "Unlimited" are the key words.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucel...ld-health-assembly-may-22-28/?sh=7eb26e8a2896
Now, I could be wrong, but the last time Tedros was involved, the US got fvcked. So who do I believe, Tucker or Tedros?
No, ‘pandemic treaty’ would not give WHO control over governments during a global health crisis
Proposed amendments to international health regulations covered by the World Health Organization does not grant the WHO any new powers over countries.
www.abc10.com
