TOP PLAYER EFFICIENCY RATINGS
Harrell 25 ... (24 pts, 4 reb, 10-15 FGs, 2 ast)
Granger 22 ... (14 pts, 6 reb, 4-5 FGs, 1 ast)
Bowers 21 ... (20 pts, 12 reb, 7-13 FGs, 1 ast)
Shamsid-Deen 15 ... (21 pts, 0 reb, 7-16 FGs, 3 ast)
PLUS-MINUS
Auburn won by 25 points.
00 Canada +26
13 Shamsid-Deen +23
25 Granger +19
05 Bowers +18
1 Harrell +15
23 Lang +11
12 Ross-Miller +7
31 Waddell +7
24 Purchase +6
Keim/Holmes/Stockton -1 each
Harrell 25 ... (24 pts, 4 reb, 10-15 FGs, 2 ast)
Granger 22 ... (14 pts, 6 reb, 4-5 FGs, 1 ast)
Bowers 21 ... (20 pts, 12 reb, 7-13 FGs, 1 ast)
Shamsid-Deen 15 ... (21 pts, 0 reb, 7-16 FGs, 3 ast)
PLUS-MINUS
Auburn won by 25 points.
00 Canada +26
13 Shamsid-Deen +23
25 Granger +19
05 Bowers +18
1 Harrell +15
23 Lang +11
12 Ross-Miller +7
31 Waddell +7
24 Purchase +6
Keim/Holmes/Stockton -1 each