This is a textbook case of witness intimidation tweeting out attacks on a witness as she testifies. The attacks were clearly aimed to intimidate and silence the ambassador and other witnesses. This will clearly be another article of impeachment.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
The derps are waiting in line at breitbart and hannity's blog for their talking points. Just as was the case during the damning testimony Wednesday, we won't hear much from them until the talking points have been issued. We don't have many on the board who are capable of forming their own thoughts.
Yes, he was already going to be impeached and he added an article today with his witness intimidation. You know he's in deep shit when Fox acknowledges it.So do you finally have him now? Lol
What was intimidating about that tweet? LolYes, he was already going to be impeached and he added an article today with his witness intimidation. You know he's in deep shit when Fox acknowledges it.
Attacking a witness is obviously intimidation. This isn't even debatable which is why even the Fox hosts pointed it out.What was intimidating about that tweet? Lol
So stating an opinion without making a threat = intimidation? That's some liberal math right there. LolAttacking a witness is obviously intimidation. This isn't even debatable which is why even the Fox hosts pointed it out.
The former RNC chair thinks you’re an idiot...So stating an opinion without making a threat = intimidation? That's some liberal math right there. Lol
This is a textbook case of witness intimidation tweeting out attacks on a witness as she testifies. The attacks were clearly aimed to intimidate and silence the ambassador and other witnesses. This will clearly be another article of impeachment.
Try to use your fvcking brain and formulate a unique thought for once in your pathetic life without the aid of Twitter. It's a really simple question. LolThe former RNC chair thinks you’re an idiot...
Yes, it is. Baier said POTUS "ripping her" added an article of impeachment in real-time.Why must you lie to make your points? That's not what Brett said at all
Obviously "ripping her", as Baier described it, as she testifies is witness intimidation. This is not a close issue. The only people who will defend this are trumpkins. POTUS could walk into the hearing room and shoot the ambassador on live TV and you and your fellow trumpkins would loudly applaud so your opinions don't carry a lot of weight.Try to use your fvcking brain and formulate a unique thought for once in your pathetic life without the aid of Twitter. It's a really simple question. Lol
Lol and your's do? Keep in mind you're the boy who cried wolf and you always will be. You are a fine representation of your party, I'll give you that. LolObviously "ripping her", as Baier described it, as she testifies is witness intimidation. This is not a close issue. The only people who will defend this are trumpkins. POTUS could walk into the hearing room and shoot the ambassador on live TV and you and your fellow trumpkins would loudly applaud so your opinions don't carry a lot of weight.
POTUS attacked a witness as she testified before Congress. That is a fact. You don't attack a witness as they are testifying unless you are trying to intimidate her and other future witnesses. That's obvious. When POTUS said he could commit a murder and not lose any supporters, he was referring to you. There is literally nothing he could do that you would cause you to object.Lol and your's do? Keep in mind you're the boy who cried wolf and you always will be. You are a fine representation of your party, I'll give you that. Lol
Lol and your's do? Keep in mind you're the boy who cried wolf and you always will be. You are a fine representation of your party, I'll give you that. Lol
Yes, it is. Baier said POTUS "ripping her" added an article of impeachment in real-time.
Way to Parrot Jim Jordan. What an idiotic argument. Surely even you aren't stupid enough to think she would not have been told about the efforts to intimidate her as soon as they took a break 5 minutes after Schiff informed her of POTUS's attack on her.She wouldn't have known about the Tweets if Schift head wouldn't have read them to her. So, it's not intimidation as you can clearly see in this response -
POTUS attacked a witness as she testified before Congress. That is a fact. You don't attack a witness as they are testifying unless you are trying to intimidate her and other future witnesses. That's obvious. When POTUS said he could commit a murder and not lose any supporters, he was referring to you. There is literally nothing he could do that you would cause you to object.
Defend and deflect. Yes, Baier said POTUS "ripping" her "added an article of impeachment in real-time."Did he say that he committed witness intimidation? Or was that another of your many lies?
Way to Parrot Jim Jordan. What an idiotic argument. Surely even you aren't stupid enough to think she would not have been told about the efforts to intimidate her as soon as they took a break 5 minutes after Schiff informed her of POTUS's attack on her.
Defend and deflect. Yes, Baier said POTUS "ripping" her "added an article of impeachment in real-time."
I am sorry POTUS screwed up so badly he lost the Fox hosts. He is making it very hard for you and the other defenders to do your job. Please don't give up the fight!
This is incredible. They were taking a break right after Schiff brought it up. Surely you are not such an ignorant clown that you think no one would have pointed out to her during the break that POTUS was attacking her as she testified? Please tell us you aren't actually that much of an idiot.Do you think she was active on Twitter during her testimony? The only reason she was aware of it was Schiff, no? What in the blue **** do you smoke every morning get your vagina so tight?
On phone, don't care. LolYou can’t even spell yours, so you are also a fine and apt representation of YOUR party.
I am sorry Brett and the other fox folks wrecked your efforts to defend POTUS. Maybe you need to switch over to the breitbart live blog? I am sure they haven't abandoned POTUS there.The subject line of the post is a complete lie. BB did not say that Trump committed witness intimidation.
Do you not see that there's literally nothing he can do that you would ever approve of? LolPOTUS attacked a witness as she testified before Congress. That is a fact. You don't attack a witness as they are testifying unless you are trying to intimidate her and other future witnesses. That's obvious. When POTUS said he could commit a murder and not lose any supporters, he was referring to you. There is literally nothing he could do that you would cause you to object.
This is incredible. They were taking a break right after Schiff brought it up. Surely you are not such an ignorant clown that you think no one would have pointed out to her during the break that POTUS was attacking her as she testified? Please tell us you aren't actually that much of an idiot.
I am sorry Brett and the other fox folks wrecked your efforts to defend POTUS. Maybe you need to switch over to the breitbart live blog? I am sure they haven't abandoned POTUS there.
Your efforts to defend and deflect for POTUS are not "measured efforts" at honest discussion. I started this thread to discuss Fox's reaction to a "turning point" as they called it in the hearing. Fox personalities responded with "wow!" and said POTUS "ripping" the ambassador would result in additional articles of impeachment. That is a fact. Obviously that is upsetting for you and you don't want to discuss it.I'm sorry you've made a living out of wrecking anyone's effort to have a measured and honest conversation on this board.
If POTUS pursued a good policy, like an infrastructure plan, I would be more than happy to give him credit. Unfortunately, his legislative agenda has been a disaster. I have no problem crediting Republicans I agree with so this is not a partisan issue. POTUS is an incompetent criminal and it disappoints me that Republicans continue to support him. I continue to hope good Republicans will eventually stand up and make it clear despicable trumpism is not the ideological center of the R party.Do you not see that there's literally nothing he can do that you would ever approve of? Lol
You do have a sick obsession over turncoat pubs, I'll give you that much. LolIf POTUS pursued a good policy, like an infrastructure plan, I would be more than happy to give him credit. Unfortunately, his legislative agenda has been a disaster. I have no problem crediting Republicans I agree with so this is not a partisan issue. POTUS is an incompetent criminal and it disappoints me that Republicans continue to support him. I continue to hope good Republicans will eventually stand up and make it clear despicable trumpism is not the ideological center of the R party.
They're just completely incapable of formulating a thought on their own at this point. They just do at they're told like the good little puppy dogs they are. LolThe idea that you and others find this tweet intimidating speaks much more about how big of snowflakes the left are... bret baier wants Trump gone as much as Stump...