Teams that should be better:
- UF, LSU, USC should be at the top of college football.
- UCLA should be better. The best University in prime recruiting territory.
- Auburn should be better. The best University in a football hungry state.
- UNC should be better. Recruiting potential has doubled in that state.
- Louisville has high potential. Nice alumni support, bigger city university, and solid recruiting potential.
- One of the Arizona schools should be better.
- UCF should play up Orlando more and hire a better coach.
- Tennessee needs a 2nd team and the Mississippi River area has talent. Memphis should be good.
- UNLV needs a rebrand and play up Vegas more.
- I like SMU playing up Dallas and plenty of money there. They will be a should be better. Great branding.
Teams who sustain success but should be worse:
- Washington. How are they good? Mediocre fan and alumni support and zero recruiting base. How are they on and off good?
- Oregon should only be good because of Phil Knight but it seems to be more than that. They get most of their players in nation wide recruiting. How? I've been there and it sucks.
- Missouri. How do they keep putting good teams on the field?
- Oklahoma. Tons of support but they live off Texas players and Oklahoma sucks as a state and recruiting territory. Hell, their brand is even redneck.
- Alabama. Cheating is the only thing I have here. No metric beyond fan support says Bama should be able to pull 5 star California QB recruits to shithouse Bama.
- Notre Dame- Catholicism is on the outs and Indiana would soften any boner.
- FSU- A dirty/nasty fanbase, in a garbage city, and a failing conference.
- UF, LSU, USC should be at the top of college football.
- UCLA should be better. The best University in prime recruiting territory.
- Auburn should be better. The best University in a football hungry state.
- UNC should be better. Recruiting potential has doubled in that state.
- Louisville has high potential. Nice alumni support, bigger city university, and solid recruiting potential.
- One of the Arizona schools should be better.
- UCF should play up Orlando more and hire a better coach.
- Tennessee needs a 2nd team and the Mississippi River area has talent. Memphis should be good.
- UNLV needs a rebrand and play up Vegas more.
- I like SMU playing up Dallas and plenty of money there. They will be a should be better. Great branding.
Teams who sustain success but should be worse:
- Washington. How are they good? Mediocre fan and alumni support and zero recruiting base. How are they on and off good?
- Oregon should only be good because of Phil Knight but it seems to be more than that. They get most of their players in nation wide recruiting. How? I've been there and it sucks.
- Missouri. How do they keep putting good teams on the field?
- Oklahoma. Tons of support but they live off Texas players and Oklahoma sucks as a state and recruiting territory. Hell, their brand is even redneck.
- Alabama. Cheating is the only thing I have here. No metric beyond fan support says Bama should be able to pull 5 star California QB recruits to shithouse Bama.
- Notre Dame- Catholicism is on the outs and Indiana would soften any boner.
- FSU- A dirty/nasty fanbase, in a garbage city, and a failing conference.
