Countdown to derpWhich EXPERT said this? I need to update my EXPERT power rankings.
Shouldn't be. A major study concerning our country's health shouldnt be controversial.Well this thread will be an AIDS thread soon.
He would just change the curriculum to fit his agenda.I'd like to make him take the math portion of the SAT right now. I bet he scores below 600
Big if true. If so it is a lot less deadly than we though.
meaning very close to herd immunity
career bureaucrat that has skin in the gamehe’s quickly climbing up my punchable face list
That was based on saying you could assume that if 85x the amount of people had it then, maybe 85x the amount of people have it now or have had it the whole time. That would put us at 60% of the US population. Even if the efforts we made slowed the 85x trend, we would still be somewhere in the 40-50% range already. It’s all assuming the op is correctNot really. We'd need to be over 60% with antibodies, which is over 10x the current estimate made by the article in the OP. By this time next year we'll probably be close.
That was based on saying you could assume that if 85x the amount of people had it then, maybe 85x the amount of people have it now or have had it the whole time. That would put us at 60% of the US population. Even if the efforts we made slowed the 85x trend, we would still be somewhere in the 40-50% range already. It’s all assuming the op is correct
Author of the article is a @VirusBro
instead of saying, “the virus is very contagious but not nearly as deadly as feared”
the author came up with this fear porn ...
———-
“The new estimates paint a grim picture of an invisible killer rapidly hopping from one victim to the next, long before stay-at-home orders and other preventative measures were implemented.”.
——
Author of the article is a @VirusBro
instead of saying, “the virus is very contagious but not nearly as deadly as feared”
the author came up with this fear porn ...
———-
“The new estimates paint a grim picture of an invisible killer rapidly hopping from one victim to the next, long before stay-at-home orders and other preventative measures were implemented.”.
——
If this is considered good news, which it would be, prepare for the incoming messages about how it isn’t true. If we had that many then already, can’t we assume we’ve had a whole lot more since then, meaning very close to herd immunity and less reason to worry about shutting things down? Also could explain the much lower death totals daily now. Now we are capturing the more realistic numbers with all the testing but when 2000 people were dying a day the cases were probably more like 100,000 a day, we just weren’t testing for them
That was based on saying you could assume that if 85x the amount of people had it then, maybe 85x the amount of people have it now or have had it the whole time. That would put us at 60% of the US population. Even if the efforts we made slowed the 85x trend, we would still be somewhere in the 40-50% range already. It’s all assuming the op is correct
Holy shitI am always complete amazed at the conclusions you come to based on what you want. It’s truly remarkable.
Holy shit
![]()
I’ve been correct on virtually everything on Covid 19.